Documents missing.
Required elements are absent, and nobody notices until an audit or a failure.
Introducing Resolve, our fast decision-making model. Meet Resolve →
Know what the supplier didn’t send. Every drawing. Every certificate. Every measurement.
See it worked throughSupplier submissions run to dozens of documents: drawings, certificates, inspection reports, control plans. Checking that every one is present, current and consistent with the others is slow, so it gets sampled.
Required elements are absent, and nobody notices until an audit or a failure.
A certificate value outside the drawing’s tolerance passes because nobody compared them.
The inspection report was done against an old revision of the drawing.
Every document in a supplier’s submission, checked for presence, currency and agreement with the drawing and specification.
One submission check. Every finding cites the page.
Supplier quality engineers see what’s missing, what disagrees and what’s out of date, with the page for each.
8 complete · 2 missing or outdated · 1 out of spec
| Element | Document | Status | Finding | Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design & specification | ||||
| DWG | Drawing HX-220 | Complete | Revision C, current | p.1 |
| SPEC | Material specification | Complete | Matches drawing note 4 | p.2 |
| Material & measurement | ||||
| CoA | Certificate of analysis | Out of spec | Bore Ø 42.09; drawing allows Ø 42.00 ±0.05 | p.3 |
| 3.1 | Material certificate | Complete | Heat 7741, matches the CoA | p.4 |
| FAI | First article inspection | Outdated | Measured against drawing revision B | p.6 |
| CPK | Capability study | Complete | Cpk 1.67 on face flatness | p.9 |
| MSA | Gauge R&R | Complete | 9% of tolerance | p.11 |
| Process & shipping | ||||
| CP | Control plan | Complete | All characteristics covered | p.12 |
| PFMEA | Process FMEA | Missing | Not included in the pack | none |
| PKG | Packaging specification | Complete | Approved | p.15 |
| PSW | Part submission warrant | Complete | Signed | p.16 |
Drawing
Bore diameter Ø 42.00 mm ±0.05, revision C.
Drawing HX-220 rev C · zone D4Certificate
Measured bore Ø 42.09 mm on sample 3 of 5.
CoA-5528.pdf · p.3 · table 2Difference
0.04 mm over the upper limit. Samples 1, 2, 4 and 5 are within tolerance.
Submission check · rule DIM-1Context
The first article report was measured against revision B, where the tolerance was ±0.10.
FAI-221 · header · p.6Hello Castell quality team,
Your submission for HX-220 can't be approved yet.
The certificate of analysis shows a bore of Ø 42.09 mm on sample 3.1 Drawing revision C allows Ø 42.00 ±0.05.2 Please confirm containment of any stock made on this process.
The first article inspection was carried out against revision B.3 Please repeat it to revision C, and include the process FMEA, which is missing from the pack.4
Checks before sending
Sign-off
Drafted by the AI. Sent only when a person approves it.
Illustrative example. Supplier, part, documents and values are fictional.
Your requirements stay the standard. The AI checks every submission against them.
Every required element checked on every pack, not a sample.
How Check works ↗Scans, spreadsheets and PDFs in any layout.
How Sense works ↗Suppliers whose packs keep failing show up as a pattern, not a surprise.
How Anticipate works ↗The documents behind a part answer other questions too.
Is this part defective?
Catch defects on the line, not at the customer.
See how →What’s blocking the restart?
Decide what’s ready and what’s blocking restart.
See how →What actually happened with this complaint?
Reconstruct what happened, and how it was handled.
See how →Did they deliver what the contract says?
See whether obligations were actually met.
See how →We’ll check it end to end and show you what the AI would have raised.
Talk to us →