Rules in the small print.
What counts as an eligible cost is set out in long scheme guidance that changes between rounds.
Which grant claims don’t add up?
Every grant claim checked against the scheme rules and the evidence behind it, so officers spend their time on the claims that don’t add up.
See it worked throughClaims are checked.
Usually a sample.
A grant scheme can receive thousands of claims, each with invoices, receipts and bank statements. Most are checked by sampling.
Evidence that doesn’t match.
The invoice says one amount, the bank statement another, and the claim a third.
Claimed twice.
The same invoice can appear in two claims, or in two schemes, and nobody sees both.
What the AI reads.
Every claim read against the scheme rules, the grant agreement and the evidence the recipient sent.
In
- Claim forms
- Invoices and receipts
- Bank statements
- Grant agreements
- Scheme rules and guidance
- Earlier claims
At work
- Sense Reads claim forms, invoices, receipts and statements, including scans.
- Understand Pulls out each cost, its date, its supplier and what it was for.
- Check Checks each cost against the rules, the evidence and every earlier claim.
- Investigate Traces a flagged cost across claims and records to show what happened.
Out
One checked claim. Every flag shows the rule and the evidence.
Every cost checked.
Every flag explained.
Grant officers see which costs are fine, which need a question, and why, with the invoice and the rule beside each one.
5 costs · 2 eligible · 1 duplicate · 1 mismatch · 1 ineligible
| Cost | Description | Check | Detail | Claimed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Solar panels, supply and fit | Eligible | Invoice, payment and agreement all agree | £18,400.00 |
| C2 | Project officer salary, April to June | Eligible | Payslips match; within the agreed rate | £7,250.00 |
| C3 | Electrical survey | Duplicate | Same invoice claimed in Q1 claim GC-6930 | £1,200.00 |
| C4 | Scaffolding hire | Mismatch | Invoice £2,640; bank statement shows £2,160 paid | £2,640.00 |
| C5 | Launch event catering | Ineligible | Hospitality excluded under rule 6.3 | £850.00 |
Duplicate
Same invoice claimed in Q1 claim GC-6930.
C3 · Electrical surveyIneligible
Hospitality excluded under rule 6.3.
C5 · Launch event cateringMismatch
Invoice £2,640; bank statement shows £2,160 paid.
C4 · Scaffolding hire
Illustrative example. Department, scheme, recipients and amounts are fictional.
Built for public money.
The AI checks every claim. Officers decide what is paid.
Nothing refused automatically.
Flagged costs go to an officer, and recipients can respond before any decision.
How Operate works ↗Every flag shows its proof.
The rule, the invoice and the earlier claim sit beside each flag.
How Check works ↗Runs in your environment.
Claims and bank details stay inside the department’s own systems, including air-gapped.
Deployment options ↗Same records.
Other questions.
The documents and data behind this work answer other questions too.
Which invoices are we overpaying?
Invoice errors
Catch overbilling, duplicates and mistakes before payment.
See how →Does this bid meet every requirement?
Bid evaluation
Score each bid against the tender, with every finding linked to the page it came from.
See how →Where is the evidence for the audit?
Audit evidence
Pull the proof together from every system.
See how →Which cases can be decided today?
Casework backlog
Clear the routine cases fast, and send the hard ones to a caseworker.
See how →Bring us a round of past claims.
We’ll check every cost against your scheme rules and show you each one we would have queried, and why.
Talk to us →LondonDiscovery AI Limited · United Kingdom
HyderabadReDscvry Technology Private Limited · India
ChennaiReDscvry Technology Private Limited · India